|
October
2006
In
the September issue, I introduced the HR Mastery Groups that I'm
forming in partnership with the Stanton Group.
If
you're looking for an opportunity
to meet monthly with other HR professionals or other individuals
with HR responsibilities, this may be a perfect opportunity for
you.
I'm
creating groups of 10-15 to meet for 2 hours for 12 consecutive
months.
The groups will be formed based on common demographics.
For
example, we're forming groups for medium size employers with full-time
HR professionals as well as groups for small employers where HR
is only part of their responsibilities.
We're
also forming a group for Veterinary practices (practice/office
managers, owners, etc.)
Each
group will meet 2 hours per month, with the first hour focused
on helping solve each other’s HR questions and issues.
The
second hour will be topic specific, with the year's topics being
selected and designed by each group, so you get to design your
learning experience.
If
you're interested in participating or learning more about how
an HR Mastery Group will work for you, call me at 952-996-0975
or email me at
arlene@arlenevernon.com.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
If
you're not
having fun
with your
human resources,
call Arlene today
at 952-996-0975 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Paying
Vacation:
An Employer's Obligation
|
I've been struggling internally with the recent onslaught of
news from various Minnesota law firms and HR resources regarding
the handling of vacation pay at termination of employment.
In a nutshell, in August 2006 the MN Court of Appeals ruled
that employers must pay employees all of their earned but unused
vacation when their employment terminates. Many employee handbooks,
including some I've written, have clauses in them that deny
vacation payouts to employees who are terminated due to policy
violations or who fail to provide adequate notice of their resignation.
According to the Court, earned vacation is considered wages
and must be paid out at termination. So, our handbooks need
to reflect this ruling.
I still recall the client who called me while standing next
to a handcuffed employee who was apprehended by the police for
stealing company merchandise. He called me to inquire whether
he was obligated to pay the individual for unused vacation.
Today's answer is yes.
Review your employee handbook to see how you're handling vacation
pay at termination and make sure it complies as stated above.
Delete any reference to withholding vacation at termination.
This ruling raises many other vacation pay issues that are not
yet defined. Should this case be appealed to the MN Supreme
Court, there may be further defining of vacation handling that
we'll have to adjust to. Some of the unanswered questions that
affect us include: Does this nullify our right to have use-or-lose
vacation carryover provisions? How does this apply to PTO payouts,
since some employers only pay out a portion of PTO since sick
time is included?
Since there are no new rulings on these and other related time
off questions, I would keep the remainder of your policies intact.
But watch for future rulings. You never know what's going to
change next.
Copyright (c) 2006 Arlene
Vernon, HRx, Inc.
|
|
Planning
Your Vacation
|
Well, not really your vacation,
but your vacation policy. Since you're already reviewing your
vacation policy, I suggest analyzing it in several other ways.
First, determinewhether your vacation policy is competitive.
Many larger employers start employee accruals at 3 weeks per
year. This is becoming the new base for time off and makes
you more competitive especially when attracting seasoned employees
to the workplace.
If you're a smaller employer, 2 weeks per year of vacation
is more common. Although some of you are still at one week
per year, place yourself in the employee's shoes of only getting
5 days off in 52 weeks. And those of you who have employees
wait 12 months until their vacation kicks in, you're only
granting 5 days off in 2 years.
If you're working in a non-profit organization, you may be
offering more generous time off packages in exchange for potentially
lower wages. I recommend that you look at the total time off
your organization grants including sick days and holidays.
Then compare these to the total number of days worked per
year and recalculate salary. Make sure you've not created
an overcompensation of employees.
Regarding the recent ruling, review your policy to see whether
accruing on a monthly basis is the best option for you. I
tend to prefer granting vacation in lump sum amounts rather
than accruals. For example, you might provide 1 week of vacation
at 6 months of employment and 2 weeks on each subsequent anniversary
from hire. Under this scenario an employee quitting in month
5 receives no payout of vacation. Creating a similar formula
may help you better manage your obligation to pay out vacation
at termination.
Well, it's all food for thought. If I can help you with this
or any other HR issue you may be facing, feel free to give
me a call!
Copyright (c) 2006 Arlene Vernon, HRx, Inc.
|
| About
Arlene Vernon |
|
Arlene Vernon, PHR, partners
with small businesses as their Human Resource Xpert to create
their HR systems and solve their HR problems.
If you have gaps in your HR operation, have an employee problem
to solve, or want to enhance your managers' skills, call Arlene
today. Learn how HRx can save you time and help you avoid costly
HR mistakes. HRx, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN 55344, 952-996-0975,
www.HRxcellence.com.
|
|
Subscriber
Info
|
HRx, Inc. respects
your privacy and does not give out or sell subscriber names and/or
e-mail addresses. Feel free to
pass this newsletter to your friends and colleagues as long as the
entire newsletter is kept intact. If this newsletter has been forwarded
to you, please sign
up to receive your own copy. If you wish to be taken off this
list simply send
an email.
|
|
Share
This Article
|
This article is available for your
use or reprinting in web sites or company communications with the
agreement that Arlene's biographical information above and a link
to her website is included with the article.
|
|